Comparison / Adobe Commerce (Magento) vs Sana Commerce
Adobe Commerce (Magento) vs Sana Commerce for Business Central
Side by side
| Adobe Commerce (Magento) | Sana Commerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Integration | Third-party connectors (i95Dev, DCKAP and others) | ERP-integrated — the shop reads Business Central logic directly |
| Commerce focus | B2B + B2C | B2B |
| Hosting | SaaS or self-hosted | SaaS |
| PIM | — | — |
| On AppSource | No | Yes |
| Pricing model | License + implementation project; open-source Magento is free, connectors are licensed | Annual subscription, quote-based |
| Typical company | Mid-market to enterprise with dedicated ecommerce teams | Mid-market B2B |
Which one, when
The architectures answer different questions. Sana asks 'what does the ERP say?' — customer agreements, credit limits and real stock drive the shop, which is exactly what B2B buyers need and exactly what connector-based setups struggle to replicate. Adobe asks 'what should the storefront do?' — and answers it with more design and campaign power than Sana will ever offer. A distributor whose buyers log in to see their negotiated prices should not be on Adobe; a consumer brand running campaigns across markets should not be on Sana. Where a company genuinely needs both, the B2B portal and the B2C brand shop are often better as two systems than as one compromise.
Full profile: Adobe Commerce (Magento) · Sana Commerce
Other comparisons
Abakion Ecommerce vs Adobe Commerce (Magento) · Adobe Commerce (Magento) vs commercebuild · Adobe Commerce (Magento) vs Dynamicweb · Abakion Ecommerce vs Sana Commerce · commercebuild vs Sana Commerce · Dynamicweb vs Sana Commerce